1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1991 Chrysler ES
To start off, 1991 Chrysler ES is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Chrysler ES weights approximately 385 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Chrysler ES (165 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1991 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1991 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 40 | ES |
Year Released | 1962 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2470 mm |