1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1991 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1991 Mahindra Armada is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1991 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | A 40 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1991 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4310 mm |
