1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1994 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1994 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | A 40 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 100 L |