1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1995 BMW Dinan
To start off, 1995 BMW Dinan is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,598 cc (12 cylinders), 1995 BMW Dinan is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 BMW Dinan (976 Nm) has 908 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 1995 BMW Dinan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1995 BMW Dinan | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | A 40 | Dinan |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 5598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 976 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2770 mm |
