1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (200 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Austin | Acura |
| Model | A 40 | TL |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 200 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2840 mm |
