1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1997 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1997 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Cadillac DeVille (271 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 945 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 1997 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 40 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 271 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1950 mm |
