1962 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Renault Clio
To start off, 1999 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,149 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Clio weights approximately 120 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Clio (93 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 1999 Renault Clio | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Clio |
Year Released | 1962 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |