1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,687 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 675 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Durango (400 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2000 Dodge Durango will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 40 | Durango |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 4687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2950 mm |
