1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2001 BMW Z18
To start off, 2001 BMW Z18 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z18 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 BMW Z18 (323 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z18 weights approximately 940 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 BMW Z18 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 BMW Z18 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z18 (340 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z18 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 2001 BMW Z18 | |
| Make | Austin | BMW |
| Model | A 40 | Z18 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 323 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1700 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 63 L |
