1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (226 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 855 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 BMW X5 (290 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2002 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 2002 BMW X5 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 40 | X5 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2890 mm |