1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser

To start off, 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser (215 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 745 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser (339 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 40 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser
Make Austin Chrysler
Model A 40 PT Cruiser
Year Released 1962 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 948 cc 2399 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 36 HP 215 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 339 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 64.6 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 101.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 8.1:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 760 kg 1505 kg
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 60 L