1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Citroen Berlingo
To start off, 2006 Citroen Berlingo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,359 cc, 2006 Citroen Berlingo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Citroen Berlingo (74 HP) has 38 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Berlingo should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Citroen Berlingo weights approximately 456 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Citroen Berlingo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 2006 Citroen Berlingo | |
Make | Austin | Citroen |
Model | A 40 | Berlingo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1359 cc |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 74 HP |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1216 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |