1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF

To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (385 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 349 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XF weights approximately 1085 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (515 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 447 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 40 2010 Jaguar XF
Make Austin Jaguar
Model A 40 XF
Year Released 1962 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 948 cc 5000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 36 HP 385 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 515 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 760 kg 1845 kg
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 4961 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1877 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1461 mm
Wheelbase Size 2220 mm 2908 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 70 L