1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 299 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Austin | Audi |
| Model | A 40 | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 68 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
