1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2011 Peugeot RCZ
To start off, 2011 Peugeot RCZ is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Peugeot RCZ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Peugeot RCZ (156 HP) has 120 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Peugeot RCZ, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 40 | 2011 Peugeot RCZ | |
Make | Austin | Peugeot |
Model | A 40 | RCZ |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 948 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 36 HP | 156 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4287 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1845 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1359 mm |