1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2012 Renault Fluence is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Fluence is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Fluence (110 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Fluence weights approximately 465 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 2012 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Austin | Renault |
| Model | A 40 | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2702 mm |
