1962 Austin A 40 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Express
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Express is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Express is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Express (260 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 40. (36 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Express should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Express weights approximately 1601 kg more than 1962 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 40 | 2013 Chevrolet Express | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | Express |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 948 cc | 6600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 36 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 2361 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5692 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 2012 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2070 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 3429 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 117 L |
