1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Austin | Volvo |
| Model | A 60 | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3260 mm |
