1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1947 Austin A 40
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 39 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 153 kg more than 1947 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1947 Austin A 40 | |
| Make | Austin | Austin |
| Model | A 60 | A 40 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1947 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 65.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 89 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 965 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2360 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 48 L |
