1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1951 Saab 92
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1951 Saab 92. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1951 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 315 kg more than 1951 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1951 Saab 92 | |
Make | Austin | Saab |
Model | A 60 | 92 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 24 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |