1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1951 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Triumph Renown is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Triumph Renown (67 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Triumph Renown should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Triumph Renown weights approximately 166 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1951 Triumph Renown (147 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1951 Triumph Renown will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1951 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | Austin | Triumph |
| Model | A 60 | Renown |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 147 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1284 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2750 mm |
