1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1952 DKW F 89
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1952 DKW F 89. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1952 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 210 kg more than 1952 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1952 DKW F 89 | |
| Make | Austin | DKW |
| Model | A 60 | F 89 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 684 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 24 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1580 mm |
