1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1953 Buick 40
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,315 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Buick 40 (123 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Buick 40 weights approximately 547 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Buick 40 (304 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1953 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1953 Buick 40 | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 60 | 40 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 4315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 304 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 80.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 104.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3090 mm |