1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1956 BMW 502
To start off, 1962 Austin A 60 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1956 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1956 BMW 502 (100 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1956 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1956 BMW 502 weights approximately 296 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1956 BMW 502 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 60 | 502 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2580 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 70 L |