1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1964 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1964 Citroen 2CV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 60 (39 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1964 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1964 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 558 kg more than 1964 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1964 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | A 60 | 2CV |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 63 L |
