1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1964 Nissan Cedric is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Nissan Cedric (60 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 33 kg more than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1964 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1962 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 115 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |