1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1967 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1967 Suzuki Fronte is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 60 (39 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 618 kg more than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 60 (87 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1967 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 60 | Fronte |
Year Released | 1962 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 18 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 32 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 66 L |