1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1968 MG 1100
To start off, 1968 MG 1100 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 MG 1100 (53 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 MG 1100 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 293 kg more than 1968 MG 1100.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 60 (87 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 MG 1100. (83 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1968 MG 1100 | |
| Make | Austin | MG |
| Model | A 60 | 1100 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 83 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
