1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1970 Ford Falcon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Ford Falcon (129 HP) has 90 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Ford Falcon weights approximately 242 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Ford Falcon (259 Nm) has 172 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1970 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 60 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3273 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 129 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 259 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2830 mm |