1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1970 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1970 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 60 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1497 cc |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
