1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste (85 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste (131 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1975 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
Model | A 60 | Celeste |
Year Released | 1962 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 85 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2350 mm |