1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1976 Nissan Bluebird

To start off, 1976 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (120 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 55 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Nissan Bluebird (167 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Austin A 60 1976 Nissan Bluebird
Make Austin Nissan
Model A 60 Bluebird
Year Released 1962 1976
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1622 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 60 HP 120 HP
Torque 122 Nm 167 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1120 kg 1175 kg
Vehicle Length 4440 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2660 mm