1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 66 (47 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 298 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Volvo 66 has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 60 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Volvo 66 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Austin | Volvo |
| Model | A 60 | 66 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 47 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
