1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1977 Volvo 164
To start off, 1977 Volvo 164 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 164 (138 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 164 (204 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1977 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1977 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 60 | 164 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 204 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3350 mm |