1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1980 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 1980 Toyota Corolla is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Corolla (68 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 233 kg more than 1980 Toyota Corolla.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Corolla (105 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1980 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1980 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 60 | Corolla |
Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 68 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2410 mm |