1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1981 Chrysler Avenger
To start off, 1981 Chrysler Avenger is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Chrysler Avenger (59 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Chrysler Avenger should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 238 kg more than 1981 Chrysler Avenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Chrysler Avenger (93 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1981 Chrysler Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1981 Chrysler Avenger | |
| Make | Austin | Chrysler |
| Model | A 60 | Avenger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2500 mm |
