1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1981 Suzuki SJ 410
To start off, 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 (44 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410.
Because 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 60 (87 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410. (75 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki SJ 410.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1981 Suzuki SJ 410 | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 60 | SJ 410 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 44 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 75 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2040 mm |