1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1981 Zastava 750
To start off, 1981 Zastava 750 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,487 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 60 (39 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 478 kg more than 1981 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Austin A 60 (87 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 750. (55 Nm). This means 1962 Austin A 60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1981 Zastava 750 | |
| Make | Austin | Zastava |
| Model | A 60 | 750 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 848 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 33 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 55 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2010 mm |
