1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 60 | Camaro |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2835 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 101 HP |
| Torque | 87 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |
