1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1983 Lada 2105
To start off, 1983 Lada 2105 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Austin A 60 (60 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1983 Lada 2105. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Austin A 60 should accelerate faster than 1983 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1983 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1983 Lada 2105 | |
Make | Austin | Lada |
Model | A 60 | 2105 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 59 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2430 mm |