1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1983 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 1983 Mercury Cougar is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 360 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1983 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Austin | Mercury |
| Model | A 60 | Cougar |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2650 mm |
