1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1983 Nissan Leopard
To start off, 1983 Nissan Leopard is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,770 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Nissan Leopard is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Nissan Leopard (97 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Nissan Leopard should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 13 kg more than 1983 Nissan Leopard.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Nissan Leopard (147 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1983 Nissan Leopard will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1983 Nissan Leopard | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 60 | Leopard |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 97 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 147 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2630 mm |