1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1984 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 1984 Fiat Argenta is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Austin A 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Fiat Argenta (100 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Fiat Argenta should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Let's talk about torque, 1984 Fiat Argenta (135 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Fiat Argenta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1984 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Austin | Fiat |
Model | A 60 | Argenta |
Year Released | 1962 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1584 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.2 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 71.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 35 L |