1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1986 BMW 316
To start off, 1986 BMW 316 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 1,573 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 BMW 316 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 BMW 316 (86 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 BMW 316 should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 48 kg more than 1986 BMW 316.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 BMW 316 (123 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1986 BMW 316 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1986 BMW 316 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 60 | 316 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1487 cc | 1573 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 123 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 70 L |