1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1986 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1986 Jaguar XJR is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 6,499 cc (12 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJR (671 HP) has 611 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1986 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1986 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 60 | XJR |
Year Released | 1962 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 6499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 671 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 90 L |