1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1988 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1988 Ford Ranger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford Ranger (109 HP) has 70 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1988 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Austin A 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1988 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Austin | Ford |
| Model | A 60 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1988 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
