1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1988 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1988 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 55 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1988 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | A 60 | Sundance |
Year Released | 1962 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 96 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2470 mm |