1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1995 Daewoo Arcadia
To start off, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia (203 HP) has 164 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 472 kg more than 1962 Austin A 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1995 Daewoo Arcadia | |
| Make | Austin | Daewoo |
| Model | A 60 | Arcadia |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1487 cc | 3206 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 203 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1590 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4960 mm |
