1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1996 Buick Century
To start off, 1996 Buick Century is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. At 3,100 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Buick Century is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Buick Century (161 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 60. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 60.
Because 1962 Austin A 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Buick Century, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Buick Century (251 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (122 Nm). This means 1996 Buick Century will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Austin A 60 | 1996 Buick Century | |
| Make | Austin | Buick |
| Model | A 60 | Century |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1622 cc | 3100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 122 Nm | 251 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4803 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1763 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1364 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2662 mm |
