1962 Austin A 60 vs. 1996 Dodge Ram
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 60 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Austin A 60 weights approximately 32 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 60. (87 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 60.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Austin A 60 | 1996 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 60 | Ram |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 447 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1118 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3020 mm |